On the evening of 21st August 2009 two black men tried to murder Simon Prophet and he was shot three times but managed to survive the attack.
One of the attackers was not so lucky and he was fatally wounded. The second attacker was apparently also shot but managed to escape. The following day a trail of what appears to have been the blood of the second attacker was found leading away from the scene of the crime.
Robbery as a motive has been ruled out and evidence points to this as having been a paid hit on Simon Prophet who maintains that the criminals behind these attacks are either someone in the Asset and Forfeiture Unit or someone in the South African Justice Department.
Prophet asks if this is organized crime or is it terrorism coming from within the government and is Willie Hofmeyr going to do anything about it and is there a "reasonable suspicion" that someone within Hofmeyr's camp is responsible for what happened?
Watch this video until you see Prophet taking his shirt off.
Who will benefit most in the event that Simon Prophet is dead?
South Africa's Prevention of Organized Crime Act of 1998 is a dirty money making racket for the government and it is not preventing crime and hidden beneath the surface, civil asset forfeiture is the beginning part of an elaborate mind control plot to end private ownership of land.
Prophet says he is going to keep screaming until others can see this Act for what it is.
for something close to murder.
Depriving someone of their home is one step away from killing them.
Hofmeyr used the notion of a "reasonable suspicion" and the play on words of "proof on a balance of probabilities" to throw Prophet and his family into the street and subjected them to abject poverty.
In terms of "presumption of innocence" and after Prophet had been found not guilty of the criminal allegations then is what Hofmeyr did legal?
